Generations of families have called the Brookhill Village community in South End home. Photo: QCity Metro

The team behind New Brookhill is at a fork in the road with plans to provide affordable housing after a gap funding request managed by Local Initiatives Support Corporation was denied Wednesday.

QCity Metro obtained an Oct. 7 email from LISC Charlotte Executive Director Ralphine Caldwell to Tom Hendrickson and Patricia Garrett of Lookout Ventures. The email cites three reasons for not supporting the $13 million request that would redevelop the Brookhill Village site in South End.

New Brookhill is planned as a 324-unit mixed-income rental community on roughly 16 acres located at South Tryon Street and Remount Road. To meet affordable housing goals, the project team proposed 65 units for people making 30% of the area’s median income, 97 at 60% AMI, two at 80% AMI and 160 at market rates. Construction would occur in phases, with current residents given priority to move into the new units.

Charlotte’s affordable housing crisis was spotlighted once again with the recent release of Mecklenburg County’s Housing and Homelessness study. Research showed a shortage of 23,060 units of affordable and available housing for households whose income is below 30% AMI. The study found that 81,611 renter households are cost-burdened, spending more than 30% of their income on housing-related expenses. At 30% AMI, a household of four can afford to pay $655 per month, whereas the fair market rate for a two-bedroom apartment is $1,063.

Hendrickson described New Brookhill as “the last opportunity for significant affordable housing in the rapidly growing South End area, with proximity for working families to jobs, services and amenities in Charlotte’s center city.”

In April, the city council didn’t approve his group’s request of $10 million from the Charlotte Housing Opportunity Investment Fund (CHOIF) and $5 million from the city’s Housing Trust Fund. After working with city staff on a revised proposal, Lookout Ventures kept the $10 million CHOIF request but lowered the ask to $2.99 million from the city’s Housing Trust Fund. 

What’s the latest?

LISC serves as the CHOIF fund manager. Caldwell’s email laid out three underwriting concerns: 

(1) Inability to demonstrate a long-term financing strategy that ensures both the Charlotte Housing Opportunity Investment Fund and the city’s debt will be repaid.

(2) Short affordability period of the project.  

(3) Reversion of the property back to the original landowner at the end of that lease and the likely loss of affordable units as a result.

“We understand the importance of Brookhill. We understand the people that are there and understand how important it would be for this development — less than a mile from Uptown,” Caldwell said in an interview with QCity Metro. “But, we also have to look at the development in its entirety and look at the application in its entirety.”

Hendrickson responded in an Oct. 9 email saying the three reasons why the New Brookhill project won’t receive support are “essentially the same” concerns Pam Wideman, Charlotte’s director of housing and neighborhood services, detailed at the April 13 city council meeting.

“We thought we resolved those,” he said. “We were ready to come back with the next steps moving forward.”

In terms of lacking a long-term financial strategy, he said his group has secured and provided documentation that ensures both the viability of affordable housing and the guaranteed 100% repayment of loans. It includes $47 million in construction and permanent financing.

Hendrickson said the New Brookhill proposal guarantees affordability for 27 years, exceeding the 20-year affordability criteria in the City of Charlotte’s request for proposal. 

“We hope that fears about tomorrow do not undermine strong and positive progress today,” Hendrickson said in the email. “The families of Brookhill deserve and should have affordable housing in place as soon as possible.”

What now?

In a statement Friday, Wideman said the city remains committed to affordable housing.

“What we’ve said to Mr. Hendrickson is that we welcome the opportunity to discuss any of this information with him. He can apply for funding in future rounds should he choose to.”

Next steps, according to Wideman, will be for the housing and neighborhood services department to develop an understanding of current Brookhill residents’ situations and further assist them in finding higher quality affordable housing. 

Hendrickson told QCity Metro that the city and LISC’s decision “speaks for itself,” but he remains optimistic for a change of heart. He’s now focused on securing funding elsewhere to keep affordable housing in Brookhill. 

“Times running short, so we needed to respond thoroughly, completely and communicate to the broader community with this decision,” Hendrickson said. “We need help.”

Hendrickson distributed a message to residents currently occupying the 143 units in Brookhill Village but posed this question to the city and LISC: 

“The question is not whether Brookhill Village will get re-developed and New Brookhill will get built, but rather… who will live there?”

Read More

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. I know this is a old post ,But i agree with Rick i also ask where Spangler its they land and there father had a good heart not saying that they don’t. we hard working people ,don;t i wish they would step up it is there land and in 27 years it goes right back to them so they will not lose anything.I have live here 59 yr ,my grandmother was the sec person to move here and my mother follow i was 6 month old . i stay cause they are affordable.This place was like family everybody knew each other. But we all know times change and they do need to be rebuilt. Just don’t forget the little people i mean the one whom pocket that are not Fat. Brookhill is home, God bless you all.

  2. Why doesn’t the Spangler Trust step up, buy back the lease and then develop affordable housing for the entire site. Wasn’t this site first developed by the Spanglers 50 years ago as affordable housing?

  3. Lately, I may be Covid-watching too much “Hamilton” on Disney+. And as I read this story I’m thinking of the song in the play “In The Room Where It Happened”, i.e., where Ultimate Decisions get made a few. (as I pat my hair now on fire). Again, Earle Village comes to mind how events played out and the then residents were shorted. I Googled and found an article and the following paragraphs are reminders about how Earle Village residents fared:
    “…In it’s [sic] place, a new, mixed-income development was built by the Charlotte Housing Authority with the promise that most Earle Village residents would get a bigger, better home or apartment to return to.
    In the end, that wasn’t what happened. While the new development, First Ward Place, was hailed as a national model for public housing, the actual number of public housing units had been reduced from 409 to about 220. And only 44 Earle Village families — or about 12% — successfully moved back in, a Charlotte Observer investigation found….” Source: